1 to 10 of 20 Results
Aug 23, 2019 - Empirical Linguistics and Computational Language Modeling (LiMo)
van den Berg, Esther; Korfhage, Katharina; Ruppenhofer, Josef; Wiegand, Michael; Markert, Katja, 2019, "Twitter Titling Corpus", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/IOHXDF, heiDATA, V1, UNF:6:+F3lLKziwMvjy+xyktkilw== [fileUNF]
The Twitter Titling Corpus contains 4002 stance-annotated tweets collected between 20 June 2017 and 30 August 2017 mentioning 6 presidents. Each tweet is annotated for the naming form used to refer to the president, for the purpose of a study on the relation between naming variat... |
Oct 7, 2019 - Empirical Linguistics and Computational Language Modeling (LiMo)
Marasović, Ana; Zhou, Mengfei; Frank, Anette, 2019, "The MSC Data Set", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/JEESIQ, heiDATA, V1
From this page you can download resources we created for modal sense classification as reported in Zhou et al. (2015), Marasović et al. (2016) and Marasović and Frank (2015) (see "Related Publication" below): Heuristically sense-annotated training data acquired from EUROPARL and... |
Sep 5, 2019 - Empirical Linguistics and Computational Language Modeling (LiMo)
Wiegand, Michael; Ruppenhofer, Josef; Schulder, Marc, 2019, "Sentiment View Lexicon (EN)", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/2JK48O, heiDATA, V1
This gold standard contains sentiment expressions (verbs, nouns and adjectives) that have been annotated according to their (prior) sentiment view. Each sentiment expression is labelled either as actor or speaker view. |
Wiegand, Michael; Bocionek, Christine; Ruppenhofer, Josef, 2019, "Sentiment Compound Data (DE)", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/LSTRK3, heiDATA, V1
This dataset contains gold standards that are required for building a classifier that automatically extracts opinion (noun) compounds. |
Sep 2, 2019 - Empirical Linguistics and Computational Language Modeling (LiMo)
Wiegand, Michael, 2019, "Opinion role extractor", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/3W7AQP, heiDATA, V1
System for the Extraction of Subjective Expressions, Sentiment Sources and Sentiment Targets from German Text |
Aug 19, 2019 - Empirical Linguistics and Computational Language Modeling (LiMo)
Kotnis, Bhushan, 2019, "Negative Sampling for Learning Knowledge Graph Embeddings", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/YYULL2, heiDATA, V1
Reimplementation of four KG factorization methods and six negative sampling methods. Abstract Knowledge graphs are large, useful, but incomplete knowledge repositories. They encode knowledge through entities and relations which define each other through the connective structure o... |
Oct 7, 2019 - Empirical Linguistics and Computational Language Modeling (LiMo)
Marasović, Ana, 2019, "Multilingual Modal Sense Classification using a Convolutional Neural Network [Source Code]", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/ERDJDI, heiDATA, V1
Abstract Modal sense classification (MSC) is aspecial WSD task that depends on themeaning of the proposition in the modal’s scope. We explore a CNN architecture for classifying modal sense in English and German. We show that CNNs are superior to manually designed feature-based cl... |
Sep 2, 2019 - Empirical Linguistics and Computational Language Modeling (LiMo)
Wiegand, Michael, 2019, "Lexicon of Abusive Words (EN)", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/MKPEYV, heiDATA, V1
This goldstandard contains a bootstrapped lexicon of abusive words. The lexicon comprises a large set of English negative polar expressions annotated as either abusive or not. |
Aug 19, 2019 - Empirical Linguistics and Computational Language Modeling (LiMo)
Kotnis, Bhushan, 2019, "KGE Algorithms", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/CSXYSS, heiDATA, V1
An updated method for link prediction that uses a regularization factor that models relation argument types Abstract (Kotnis and Nastase, 2017): Learning relations based on evidence from knowledge repositories relies on processing the available relation instances. Knowledge repos... |
Mara, Hubert, 2019, "HeiCuBeDa Hilprecht - Heidelberg Cuneiform Benchmark Dataset for the Hilprecht Collection", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/IE8CCN, heiDATA, V2
The number of known cuneiform tablets is assumed to be in the hundreds of thousands. A fraction has been published by printing photographs and manual tracings in books, which is collected by the online Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (CDLI) catalog including some of these im... |
