11 to 20 of 121 Results
Nov 9, 2020 -
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents [Dataset]
Stata Syntax - 5.4 KB -
MD5: 8d32fce2f47f8c88f1b1d2c604bf8bae
|
Nov 9, 2020 -
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents [Dataset]
Tabular Data - 151.6 KB - 91 Variables, 324 Observations - UNF:6:OSUAlPRWzeMYn2jXLJJ6XQ==
|
Nov 9, 2020 -
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents [Dataset]
Tabular Data - 152.3 KB - 91 Variables, 324 Observations - UNF:6:OZ5l6aFz6WApMzXn0+5TSQ==
|
Nov 9, 2020 -
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents [Dataset]
Adobe PDF - 126.7 KB -
MD5: 6e4209013e7367cfbd44dd6a85c06599
|
Oct 28, 2020
Oechssler, Jörg; Roomets, Alex, 2020, "Savage vs. Anscombe-Aumann: an experimental investigation of ambiguity frameworks [Dataset]", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/RTQIUG, heiDATA, V1, UNF:6:znXzfO0UeSWMUd6rxjZvVw== [fileUNF]
The Savage and the Anscombe–Aumann frameworks are the two most popular approaches used when modeling ambiguity. The former is more flexible, but the latter is often preferred for its simplicity. We conduct an experiment where subjects place bets on the joint outcome of an ambiguo... |
Oct 28, 2020 -
Savage vs. Anscombe-Aumann: an experimental investigation of ambiguity frameworks [Dataset]
MS Word - 14.3 KB -
MD5: 73710436783bf64a4b3a4dfbd44ccafe
|
Oct 28, 2020 -
Savage vs. Anscombe-Aumann: an experimental investigation of ambiguity frameworks [Dataset]
Tabular Data - 35.0 KB - 65 Variables, 124 Observations - UNF:6:Q4jN0r6T3MT8+XfGKeRY7w==
|
Oct 28, 2020 -
Savage vs. Anscombe-Aumann: an experimental investigation of ambiguity frameworks [Dataset]
MS Excel Spreadsheet - 11.9 KB -
MD5: d92fdce8aeaa4619b3fdd1f84fd603c1
|
Oct 28, 2020 -
Savage vs. Anscombe-Aumann: an experimental investigation of ambiguity frameworks [Dataset]
MS Excel Spreadsheet - 11.6 KB -
MD5: 030d8333e3645c5c0889c84dc0f5dc15
|
Oct 28, 2020 -
Savage vs. Anscombe-Aumann: an experimental investigation of ambiguity frameworks [Dataset]
Stata Syntax - 2.0 KB -
MD5: e68626f586a268a5c913906a028f0b23
|