1 to 10 of 77 Results
Nov 9, 2020 -
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents [Dataset]
Tabular Data - 170.9 KB - 97 Variables, 670 Observations - UNF:6:QVJeRf9KhW9iXqQllbXFiA==
|
Nov 9, 2020 -
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents [Dataset]
Tabular Data - 205.5 KB - 97 Variables, 670 Observations - UNF:6:QVJeRf9KhW9iXqQllbXFiA==
|
Nov 9, 2020 -
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents [Dataset]
MS Excel Spreadsheet - 247.9 KB -
MD5: 9d5a908b92827860933f1e53e9fc5c77
|
Nov 9, 2020 -
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents [Dataset]
Tabular Data - 38.1 KB - 31 Variables, 297 Observations - UNF:6:s+cYymgTfks0x4xY8R9jJA==
|
Nov 9, 2020 -
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents [Dataset]
Tabular Data - 38.1 KB - 31 Variables, 297 Observations - UNF:6:57NLwfDGYG7CZTZuNLSXbw==
|
Nov 9, 2020 -
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents [Dataset]
Tabular Data - 151.6 KB - 91 Variables, 324 Observations - UNF:6:OSUAlPRWzeMYn2jXLJJ6XQ==
|
Nov 9, 2020 -
Good decision vs. good results: Outcome bias in the evaluation of financial agents [Dataset]
Tabular Data - 152.3 KB - 91 Variables, 324 Observations - UNF:6:OZ5l6aFz6WApMzXn0+5TSQ==
|
Oct 28, 2020 -
Savage vs. Anscombe-Aumann: an experimental investigation of ambiguity frameworks [Dataset]
Tabular Data - 35.0 KB - 65 Variables, 124 Observations - UNF:6:Q4jN0r6T3MT8+XfGKeRY7w==
|
Oct 28, 2020 -
Savage vs. Anscombe-Aumann: an experimental investigation of ambiguity frameworks [Dataset]
Tabular Data - 32.1 KB - 65 Variables, 124 Observations - UNF:6:Q4jN0r6T3MT8+XfGKeRY7w==
|
Sep 14, 2020 -
Copy Trading [Dataset]
MS Excel Spreadsheet - 3.2 MB -
MD5: aa1762b253ff24e7c6425729c28862f3
|