Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity [Dataset]doi:10.11588/data/10097heiDATA2017-02-061Trautmann, Stefan T.; Van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2017, "Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity [Dataset]", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/10097, heiDATA, V1Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity [Dataset]doi:10.11588/data/10097Trautmann, Stefan T.Van de Kuilen, GijsTrautmann, Stefan T.Van de Kuilen, Gijs2013Tilburg (Netherlands)heiDATAheiDATA: Heidelberg Research Data RepositoryStefan Trautmann, Bergheimer Str. 58 (Room 01.029), 69115 Heidelberg, Germany, Phone: +49 6221 54 2952, Fax: +49 6221 54 35922017-02-06Social Sciencesprocess fairnessoutcome fairnessdynamic decision makingC91D63D81Literature on fairness preferences distinguishes between outcome fairness, concerning the final allocation of payoffs, and process fairness, concerning the expected allocation of payoffs. It is not obvious, however, whether process fairness can consistently be implemented. Once uncertainty is resolved and outcomes are determined, the ex-ante procedurally fair decision maker may become consequentialist ex-post, and reconsider her choice on the basis of the observed outcomes. We present experimental evidence on dynamic consistency of social preferences under both known risk and ambiguity. A significant share of people subscribe to process fairness both before and after the resolution of uncertainty.Netherlandsbehavioral experiment; laboratorywe would like to make these data and do-files freely available. People using the data should cite the data/publicationTrautmann, S. T. and G. van de Kuilen (2017). Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1-1410.1007/s11166-016-9249-4Trautmann, S. T. and G. van de Kuilen (2017). Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1-14DynamicData_Ambiguity.dtaapplication/x-stataDynamicData_risk.dtaapplication/x-stataprocessfairdyn.dotext/x-stata-syntax; charset=US-ASCII