|
View: |
Part 1: Document Description
|
|
Citation |
|
|---|---|
|
Title: |
Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity [Dataset] |
|
Identification Number: |
doi:10.11588/data/10097 |
|
Distributor: |
heiDATA |
|
Date of Distribution: |
2017-02-06 |
|
Version: |
1 |
|
Bibliographic Citation: |
Trautmann, Stefan T.; Van de Kuilen, Gijs, 2017, "Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity [Dataset]", https://doi.org/10.11588/data/10097, heiDATA, V1 |
|
Citation |
|
|
Title: |
Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity [Dataset] |
|
Identification Number: |
doi:10.11588/data/10097 |
|
Authoring Entity: |
Trautmann, Stefan T. (Alfred-Weber-Institute of Economics) |
|
Van de Kuilen, Gijs (Alfred-Weber-Institute of Economics) |
|
|
Producer: |
Trautmann, Stefan T. |
|
Van de Kuilen, Gijs |
|
|
Date of Production: |
2013 |
|
Distributor: |
heiDATA |
|
Distributor: |
heiDATA: Heidelberg Research Data Repository |
|
Access Authority: |
Stefan Trautmann, Bergheimer Str. 58 (Room 01.029), 69115 Heidelberg, Germany, Phone: +49 6221 54 2952, Fax: +49 6221 54 3592 |
|
Date of Deposit: |
2017-02-06 |
|
Holdings Information: |
https://doi.org/10.11588/data/10097 |
|
Study Scope |
|
|
Keywords: |
Social Sciences, process fairness, outcome fairness, dynamic decision making |
|
Topic Classification: |
C91, D63, D81 |
|
Abstract: |
Literature on fairness preferences distinguishes between outcome fairness, concerning the final allocation of payoffs, and process fairness, concerning the expected allocation of payoffs. It is not obvious, however, whether process fairness can consistently be implemented. Once uncertainty is resolved and outcomes are determined, the ex-ante procedurally fair decision maker may become consequentialist ex-post, and reconsider her choice on the basis of the observed outcomes. We present experimental evidence on dynamic consistency of social preferences under both known risk and ambiguity. A significant share of people subscribe to process fairness both before and after the resolution of uncertainty. |
|
Country: |
Netherlands |
|
Kind of Data: |
behavioral experiment; laboratory |
|
Methodology and Processing |
|
|
Sources Statement |
|
|
Data Access |
|
|
Citation Requirement: |
we would like to make these data and do-files freely available. People using the data should cite the data/publication |
|
Other Study Description Materials |
|
|
Related Publications |
|
|
Citation |
|
|
Title: |
Trautmann, S. T. and G. van de Kuilen (2017). Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1-14 |
|
Identification Number: |
10.1007/s11166-016-9249-4 |
|
Bibliographic Citation: |
Trautmann, S. T. and G. van de Kuilen (2017). Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1-14 |
|
Label: |
DynamicData_Ambiguity.dta |
|
Text: | |
|
Notes: |
application/x-stata |
|
Label: |
DynamicData_risk.dta |
|
Text: | |
|
Notes: |
application/x-stata |
|
Label: |
processfairdyn.do |
|
Text: | |
|
Notes: |
text/x-stata-syntax; charset=US-ASCII |